Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Community/Advocacy/Myths

Timestamp:

02/27/09 16:42:13 (4 years ago)

Author:

bthrall (IP: 68.93.203.30)

Comment:

--

Community/Advocacy/Myths

@@ -1 +1 @@
 [[TracNav(TracNav/CommunityTOC)]]
 = Dispelling the myths =
-This page, presented as a FAQ, is a way to give arguments againts myths, and potentially dishonest arguments.
+This page, presented as a FAQ, is a way to give arguments againts myths and potentially dishonest arguments.
 
 {{{
@@ -9 +9 @@
 
 '''OpenGL vs Direct3D'''
-> TODO: Say that D3D and OpenGL are different byt are roughly equivalent when talking about performance and features. However, OpenGL is cross-platform (D3D is not), and is open source/open standard. (See the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_OpenGL_and_Direct3D comparison article on Wikipedia] and discussions on the mailing list).
+> TODO: Say that D3D and OpenGL are different but are roughly equivalent when talking about performance and features. However, OpenGL is cross-platform (D3D is not), and is open source/open standard. (See the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_OpenGL_and_Direct3D comparison article on Wikipedia] and discussions on the mailing list).
 
 ----
 
-'''Learning to use a scene graph costs too much!'''
+'''Learning to use a scene graph costs too much! '''
 > TODO: Say that it may cost a bit, but the return on investment is highly profitable.
 
@@ -19 +19 @@
 
 '''Is OSG suitable for a game?'''
-> TODO: Say that having a scene graph into a game engine is not '''that''' common, but here again, the return on investment is highly profitable. However, OSG does not adress all aspects of a game engine, such as AI, pathfinding and such.
+> TODO: Say that having a scene graph into a game engine is not '''that''' common, but here again, the return on investment is highly profitable. However, OSG does not address all aspects of a game engine, such as AI, pathfinding and such.
 
 ----